Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05810
Original file (BC 2013 05810.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-05810
		
			COUNSEL:  NONE

		HEARING DESIRED:  NO



APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He be awarded the following:

1.  The Bronze Star Medal (BSM).

2.  The Meritorious Service Medal (MSM). (Administratively corrected)



APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He received the BSM and MSM while on active duty, but they do not appear on his retirement DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.



STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force on 30 Jan 55.  

On 1 Sep 78, the applicant retired, and was credited with 23 years, 7 months, and 1 day of total active service.

On 24 Mar 14, AFPC/DPSIDR directed the applicant’s records be corrected to reflect the following:

		a.  Change “VSM” to read “Vietnam Service Medal with three Bronze Service Stars (VSM w/3BSS).”

		b.  Add the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm (RVNGC w/P).  

		c.  Add the Meritorious Service Medal (MSM).

		d.  Add the Non Commissioned Officer Professional Military Education Graduate Ribbon (NCOPMEGR).  

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memoranda prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are included at Exhibits C and D.



AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSID recommends granting the applicant’s request for award of the BSM.  The applicant provided a certificate for award of the BSM for the period 28 Nov 68 through 27 Sep 69 which appears to be authentic.  
 
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C.

SAF/MRBP recommends granting the applicant’s request for the BSM.  The applicant provided a certificate and special order for award of the MSM for the period 9 Jul 75 through 31 Aug 78 and AFPC directed the applicant’s DD Form 214 be administratively corrected to add the MSM.  The applicant also submitted a certificate for award of the BSM for the period 28 Nov 68 through 27 Sep 69 which appears to be authentic, so his DD Form 214 should also be updated to add the BSM. 

A complete copy of the SAF/MRBP evaluation is at Exhibit D.



APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 21 Jul 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit E).  As of this date, no response has been received by this office.



THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an injustice.  We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case and agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that applicant’s request for the BSM should be granted.  The Board notes the applicant’s records have been administratively corrected to reflect award of the MSM, along with several other decorations.  Therefore, we recommend the applicant’s record be corrected as indicated below.



THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal on 27 September 1969.



The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-05810 in Executive Session on 13 Nov 14 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	Panel Chair
	Member
	Member

All members voted to correct the records as recommended.  The following documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 16 Dec 13, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSID, dated 24 Mar 14.
	Exhibit D.  Memorandum, SAF/MRBP, dated 29 Apr 14.
	Exhibit E.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 21 Jul 14.

						



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00809

    Original file (BC 2014 00809 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Other than the reference to the DFC in his unit’s awards and decorations officer’s 14 Feb 69 letter, there is no official military documentation recommending or awarding the DFC to the applicant. Notwithstanding the above, AFPC/DPSID’s research did reveal the AM w/3BOLC, VCM, Vietnam Service Medal with four Bronze Service Stars (VSM w/4 BSS), and Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm (RVNGC w/P), should have been awarded during the applicant’s service from 26 Feb 65 to 12 Nov 68 but...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05271

    Original file (BC 2013 05271.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Vietnam service. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. _______________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends disapproval of the applicant’s request to correct his records to reflect service in Thailand.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02624

    Original file (BC 2014 02624.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    While it is noted the applicant’s AF IMT 3994, Recommendation for Decoration Deployment/Contingency Operations, dated , does not mention the BSM, and the applicant does not have a recommendation for upgrade from someone with firsthand knowledge of the act/achievement, preferably from someone within his chain of command at the time of the act/achievement, a proposed citation, or eyewitness statements, AFPC/DPSIDR believed based on the MSM recommendation package the applicant's actions were at...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03961

    Original file (BC 2013 03961.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends disapproval for the award of the PH Medal, indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The applicant did not provide any documentation substantiating he received an injury...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00408

    Original file (BC 2014 00408.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit E. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He served for a little less than four years because of hazardous missions flown in SEA. While the applicant has not provided conclusive evidence that he completed a TDY to Vietnam, it is our opinion the APR for the period ending 27 Sep 68 coupled with AFPS’s database appear to weigh more in favor of amending the applicant’s DD Form 214 to reflect award of the VSM with one Bronze Service Star...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05439

    Original file (BC 2013 05439 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The Board should consider it in the interest of justice to consider his application as he has earned these medals and they should be reflected on his DD Form 214. According to his DD Form 214, he was awarded the VSM and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVCM). DPSID determined the applicant should have been awarded the AFCM, RVNGC w/P and VSM w/3 BSS for his service from 29 Oct 68 to 11 Sep 72.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00061

    Original file (BC 2014 00061.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    After receiving an Article 15 subsequent to her deployment, the Air Force revoked the BSM and she was never issued the medal. Additionally, Army Regulation (AR) 600-8-22 requires an award be revoked if subsequent information is revealed that would not have warranted the award had it been known at the time of the award. The actions by the approval authority to revoke the BSM are correct and well within the regulations, as the applicant’s service during the inclusive award period was not...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02456

    Original file (BC 2014 02456.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. The DMSM will not be awarded for any period of service for which a Military Department medal is awarded. The applicant was recommended for a DMSM, not a BSM.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2007-02137

    Original file (BC-2007-02137.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are at Exhibits B and D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDR notes that while serving as a first sergeant and attached to the Army, the applicant was deployed to Balad Air Base (AB), Iraq from 5 Dec 04 to 5 Apr 05. They recommend the Board review the nominating official’s original...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01359

    Original file (BC 2014 01359.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The AFCM is awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United States, below the grade of Colonel and foreign military personnel, who, while serving in any capacity with the Department of the Air Force after 28 Mar 58, distinguished themselves by outstanding achievement or meritorious service. The original award approval authority determined the AFCM was the appropriate award to recognize the applicant's outstanding achievement on 22 Mar 75. A complete copy of the SAF/MRBP evaluation is...